The Call of the Wild / 2020

Get Up Dogs / Buddy Tabor

MFW Review:

I couldn’t get past the fact that I could see that this wasn’t a real dog.
This kinda ruined my enjoyment / immersion.
And that they also took liberties with the story – the book.
4 out of 10.


Yukon, Canada (Klondike Gold Rush)
British Columbia, Canada
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Santa Clarita, California, USA

More Box Office Blunders:

Wikipedia says: “As of March 15, 2020, The Call of the Wild has grossed $62.1 million in the United States and Canada, and $45.2 million in other territories, for a worldwide total of $107.3 million. Due to its high production and marketing costs, the film will need to gross $250–275 million in order to break-even; various publications estimate it will lose the studio between $50–100 million.”

MFW: This isn’t the first time that Disney has made this identical marketing blunder. Solo: a Star Wars Movie also took a huge loss of millions of dollars from over marketing. (Ironically, Harrison Ford was the original Han Solo.)  


Author: jcalberta

Howdy! I love Westerns. ... and the purpose of this is to celebrate My Favorite Westerns! and to hopefully inspire folks to watch these great Western movies again - with fresh eyes and appreciation. This site will eventually display my top 30 favorite Westerns - or more. I will have original graphic work with regular updates/news about Western Movies. All this - and more ... Yee Haw ... !! - jcablerta / Moderator / Administrator

6 thoughts on “The Call of the Wild / 2020”

  1. You “like” button is not working. Neither is anyone else’s.

    I also didn’t like that the dog isn’t a real dog. Seems to me there are enough real dogs around that they could have found the right one.

    1. Nobody’s ‘like’ button is working? Probably something I screwed up somehow?
      Marilyn, I went to that movie with 3 other people and they all liked it. But because of the artificial dog I just couldn’t get past that. Yeah, we don’t have anyone who can pull that off? Sad. But like I said, for me it has to measure up to the book somehow – and that is pretty hard.

    1. Yes Harrison was good. Always is. He was the draw, but if they just made good movie based on the book … ? Why make the movie at all? Did somebody have an inspired interpretation? For the most part – apart from CGI Buck – who is supposed to be the heart of this thing – the movie was good – and the folks I was with enjoyed it. I guess It’s just me.

  2. Haven’t seen any of the films, but the book was a classic even though it had a rather sad ending.

    1. London was a good and original writer. Lots of people liked his philosophy.
      The ending is sad yes. I believe more than one film version dared to change the ending.

Leave a Reply