Magnificent Sevens … myth, math and aftermath … Part 1

10 Oct

I finally went and saw The Magnificent Seven (2016) the other night.
I had initially said that I wouldn’t judge this movie by the original,
but it raises so many issues surrounding modern Film Making – and Westerns
that I couldn’t resist.

the-magnificent-7-2016“Justice has a number”
M7 (2016) tagline

SIx Shooter Bar

cineplex

mgm-lioncolumbia-logo“Remakes? You probably shouldn’t go there.”
– My Favorite Westerns

SIx Shooter Bar

The CWF Film Critique System

Being a Film Critic of no renown, I have deferred my critiquing chores to my unfamous and trusted colleague Cecil W. (Wannabe) FordWannabe is not a respected Film Critic, but to make up for that by his high HO (Highly Opinionated) Rating – especially of himself. This, combined with his unique CWF Critique System (whereby each movie is subjected to Wannabe’s stringent CWF testing criteria) he arrives at a judgment. Maybe.

SIx Shooter Bar

Let us proceed.

The Magnificent Seven (2016) Review

by Cecil W(annabe). Ford

the-magnificent-7-2016-banner

 I like to think that NOTHING is impossible.
But my expectations were not high.
Why? Because a Remake of the Magnificent Seven IS pretty well impossible.
Denzel Washington says right there himself at the start of the movie:

Quote:
Denzel Washington
(Sam Chisolm):
“Took a job – looking for a some men to join us.”
Chris Pratt (Josh Farraday):
“Is it difficult?”
Denzel Washington:
“Impossible.”

This is not mere dialogue (quoted from the first movie): It’s Film director and Producer Antoine Fuqua’s open admission that there is no way he could make a movie that will equal the Original Magnificent Seven (1960).
No way.
You have to give him credit for admitting that. He knew it. And there are definite reasons for that knowledge – things that were beyond his control. I’ll get to those …

antoine-fuqua

The real question is: Why? Why make the movie? Why make movie that you know is going to be compared to the incomparable? If you know something is impossible, then Why attempt it?

the-magnificent-7-why

Antoine Fuqua’s last 9 movies have all made money – including M7 2016.
In Film Making that makes him a SuperStar.

SIx Shooter Bar

Time for Wannabe’s Test # One:

Test One: The CWF Charismometer
Measuring Star Power / Charisma / Casting

My first Test will employ the trusty CWF Charismometer. This will infallibly measure, Star Power, Charisma, and Casting – vital components in any movie – and the main factors that Fuqua, his Writers, and the Producers … or anybody – could not match from the Original Magnificent Seven.

We’ll start with Yul Brunner and Denzel Washington.

Charismometer says:

the-magnificent-7-2016-denzel-meter

Denzel is a Star. No doubt about it. And a good Actor.
And if he wasn’t in M7 2016, it wouldn’t hardly be worth a sniff.
But compared to Yul Brynner?
Well, it’s a good thing I tested Denzel first, because Yul blew my Charismometer  to smithereens.

the-magnificent-7-2016-yul-meterBOOOM!

This is the first reason  – and likely most important reason – M7 2016 couldn’t match the original.

I will next test the rest …

SIx Shooter Bar

Those Thrilling Stars of Yesteryear

Is it just me? or is the Star Power in modern Film not equal to the Star Power of yesteryear – 50’s and 60’s. 70’s???
John Wayne, Cary Grant, Charlton Heston, Kirk Douglas, Gregory Peck, James Stewart, Clark Gable, Bogart, Gary Cooper, Spencer Tracy, Fonda, Brando 
I could go on and on and on. And then start on the ladies.
Yes. we certainly have Stars and some very good actors these days … but …

Part 2 … Coming Soon

 

9 Responses to “Magnificent Sevens … myth, math and aftermath … Part 1”

  1. Cindy Bruchman October 11, 2016 at 7:16 am #

    What a fun post and great to see you dissecting it so well. With regards to your star test, keep in mind in fifty years time, we’ll be looking at the stars today with emotional, nostolgic eyes. Over time they mellow like a nice wine.

    • jcalberta October 11, 2016 at 9:21 am #

      AHA ! LoL !
      I ‘spoze yor rite about the nostalgia thing. Hope so. Also hope I’m still around in 50 years.

  2. timneath October 22, 2016 at 3:02 pm #

    Great to see all your post on the new M7, sorry it didn’t live up. Was it a decent film as just a Western?

    • jcalberta October 22, 2016 at 11:16 pm #

      Slickly done – modern style action movie – lots of explosions and bodies … about what you’d expect.

      • timneath October 23, 2016 at 4:30 am #

        So an action movie rather than a Western, Will be you be watching again?

      • jcalberta October 24, 2016 at 10:34 pm #

        Yeah … I’ll watch it again – not right away. See how I feel second time around. Production values are high, but … I’d be interested in your opinion. ?

      • timneath October 25, 2016 at 11:28 am #

        So you’ve not given up on it. I’m holding fire until it comes out on TV/DVD to take a look. I really want to catch 7S.

      • jcalberta October 25, 2016 at 7:56 pm #

        I never felt like I was wasting my money. It was interesting. It’s just that I pretty well knew what to expect – and it didn’t exceed that.

      • timneath October 26, 2016 at 11:29 am #

        So you got what you paid for and not much else 😦 I look forward to seeing, I’m just prepared to wait now after all I’ve read, killed the excitement for me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: