Ragnar / King …

ragnar 1

Travis Fimmel

ragnar 2ragnar 3

Katheryn Winnick 


Bloody … but bloody good. 

When this series first started I figured it might just be another of those mindless pseudo-epics you see on Starz – a Spartacus spin-off.

But it isn’t.

Yes, there’s lots of violence – surely some blood – but the overall production is high quality – and has continually improved.
So it’s just a matter of whether they can keep the writing on a decent level.

So far so good.

Author: jcalberta

Howdy! I love Westerns. ... and the intent of MyFavoriteWesterns.com is to celebrate Western Movies/Film - old and new. This site will eventually show my top 30 favorite Westerns - or more. I will have original graphic work with regular updates. All this - and more ... Yee Haw ... !! - jcablerta / Moderator / Administrator

4 thoughts on “Ragnar / King …”

  1. So does Rose .. same thing. Especially torture scenes. I can usually bear it – could do without it – don’t endorse it. But there was one particular execution scene in this series that was really tough. Possible a realistic enactment but … this is why I stopped watching a lot of the stuff on Starz – it’s whole purpose seemed to exploit people’s blood lust.

    1. AH ! You speak of the Classic ! Borgnine as Ragnar !

      Hard to match that !

      This new Vikings is actually very well done – but somewhat brutal. It’s a TV show. I watched it on and off the first year and just kept getting better.

      1. I have a problem with graphic violence. Always have.I can’t watch it. Garry always covers my eyes if he knows it’s coming. I’ll pass 🙂

Leave a Reply